One of my younger friends has commissioned me to build a Minecraft Server-enabled PC as cost-effectively as possible. Have each found very good deals, so each of two different sellers the Fx and the a10 each already with motherboard and so and 16 GB of RAM, the catch, the Fx offer is not included graphics card, in the A10 I would have for 110 euro in total a R9 270x but for the Fx offer a bit better motherboard and a hard drive even for 110 euro you think the 4 additional cores of the Fx make a big difference in a maximum utilization of vllt. 10 who play at once? The Fx system would cost 50 more in the end because of a graphics card (I asked the seller of the A10 system and he would sell me the R9 For exactly 50 euro, therefore…
In any case, the fx system would be the first choice for me, the additional cores in practice are quite noticeable in practice.
Have fun playing!
Why a graffiti card for a server? XD
Yes, somehow I have to get a picture signal, right? XD
And still, so was my idea, if the server goes offline or something, just stop to render one or the other video
Please tell your friend that he should use Linux instead of Windows for the server because it saves resources
Cheap graphics card and not this medium-low end graphics card
Achso good idea, yes software and so I have to do synonymous therefore thank you for your tip!
"The one or the other video render" I do not think that goes with a GT 710 😐
This is a server, not a workstation!
What do you think is better?
Linux?
No, I mean by the cpu's?
So for a server I would not take either of these, rather NEN Xeon X5650 or best 2x Xeon X5650, you just have to find a real motherboard
But if I had to decide then the fx
Does not have an onboard graphics card? You also have to be careful with cheap graphics cards. Times had one for 30 euro original price, which then overheated in continuous operation and brought the whole computer to crash.
