I currently have a processor from Amd Ryzen 3 3200G and use the Vega 8 graphics I wanted to ask whether it is worth upgrading to a Radeon Rx 580 or not, I played Star wars battlefront 2 and I like to play Minecraft with good shaders and a little microsoft flight simulator 2020 Then I would say graphics means for the flight simulator means 1080p is enough for me if the card doesn't manage that tell me which one would be worth it I have a 650 watt power supply
So with an RX 580 you would have at least a performance increase of approx. 400% …
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/...1833vs3923
And the R3-3200G (4/4) and an RX-580 (8GB) also go perfectly together:
https://pc-builds.com/calculator/Ryzen_3_3200G/Radeon_RX_580/0Up0Yg28/16/100
And maybe you will exchange the 4/4-core CPU for an R5-3600x (6/12) later. The part has more cores and clocks a little higher.
In the case of "more up-to-date" games such as the MS Flight Simulator, this brings significant added value.
This simulation benefits from many cores (=> R7-3700x / 3800x (8/16)) and even 32GB Ram make sense here.
Your 650W power supply can handle all of this without any problems.
Martin know it is currently quite expensive as it would be if I buy and use a Gtx 970 temporarily Until I have saved enough for a new one because otherwise I have to play with the Vega for a few months and the Gtx 970 would be enough for me to start with new ones only temporarily for a few months?
Just ask Google
Yes, my assistant doesn't know the answer
The GTX 970 has "only" 4GB VRam, but is on par with the RX 580 (8GB).
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/...2577vs3923
https://pc-builds.com/calculator/Ryzen_3_3200G/GeForce_GTX_970/0Up0LE8A/16/100
Another possibility would be a GTX 1060 (6GB):
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/...3639vs3923
The MS flight simulator is very demanding on the hardware if it is to look nice.
As much VRam as possible is required for the highly detailed textures. Otherwise the details have to be screwed down significantly.
What kind of "assistant"?
Google Assistant
I meant the normal Google
Yes ok then I'll take the 1060 Unfortunately a new one costs over 200, so I have to order used ones on ebay
That's currently so far (relatively) ok…: - /
A year ago there was already a new GTX 1660 super (6GB) for 200-250 euro…
Today these models are no longer "affordable"… (
https://www.hardwareschotte.de/hardware/preise/catid_1100082/preis_Grafikkarten+von+NVIDIA?pfpd=558,nVidia+GeForce+GTX+1660+Super+(TU116)
Yes, that's a shame Because of this virus and Bitcoin Everything is overpriced Maybe if the virus is no longer there everything is as it used to be with the graphics types Then maybe it is better And everything is like it used to be. Maybe then all prices are a bit cheaper
It doesn't have too much to do with this "virus".
Ok, some want to upgrade and therefore the (private) demand is also increasing.
But much more decisive is the crypto mining, which more powerful Grakas with at least 6GB VRam need. Bots buy the whole market empty in seconds if something should be available.
But the limited production capacities of the few capable manufacturers and the massive "overbooking" for the corresponding chips also play a major role. The use of the conductor tracks, which have become extremely fine in the meantime, currently still generates a lot of rejects. This makes the situation even worse.
It's not just the CPUs for the graphics cards. The cell phone and car industries are also demanding more and more powerful electronics. And then there are the game console manufacturers… It all requires a lot of production capacity.
The next problem is the raw materials, their processing and even the extraction of the necessary "rare earths", some of which are located in areas of crisis and war. And here "the virus" also has a certain share, since global transport is also affected.
And such "accidents" as the one with the freighter that blocked the Suez Canal are not exactly helpful either.
I have read in some places that this problem could remain with us for the next 2 years.
